The Only Political Endorsements you Need to Read this Election.

October 27, 2006 – 4:17 pm

I have a tradition in which I use my web space every major election year to make political endorsements. You may say to yourself, “But Rob, you hate politics.” This is true, but I still vote, and my opinion is important. In fact, I expect every last one of my endorsements to swing every important race — I’m that sure of myself.

There are a few things worth mentioning before I proceed. I don’t believe any one party is superior to another. I refuse to associate myself with those who assume that Party X is God’s Truth on Earth while every member of Party Y is a liar/in it for the money/a wimp/a puppy-hater…or vice-versa. Further, many of you know me as a libertarian with a small ‘L.’ This is important, because I will rarely vote for any candidates who call themselves Libertarians with a capital ‘L.’ They’re just too weird for me, and I can do nothing but think about their websites featuring glamor shots of them in cheap suits.

In the 2004 election, I endorsed and voted for four Republicans and two Democrats (only counting the races that matter to me), and voted no on the gay marriage ban (which, of course, passed). This year is looking a little different. Here are my endorsements:

Pete Ashdown (D) for United States Senate

I mentioned in an earlier post that Orrin Hatch’s original campaign slogan was, “What do you call a senator who has been in Washington for 18 years? You call him home.” Orrin Hatch has been in Washington for much longer and has become way too Washington. Call him home.

Jim Matheson (D) for US Representative Districit 2

I don’t always agree with Matheson’s votes, but he has been a rare demonstration of a politician who advocates fiscal responsibility and votes for it.

Dr. Joseph Jarvis (R) for State Senate District 2

I’ll admit it, I work for this campaign. When Scott McCoy replaced Paula Julander upon her resignation (a result of breast cancer), she encouraged delegates to elect her husband to be her replacement. The party chose otherwise, and they chose Scott McCoy. Frankly, I didn’t care. However, McCoy has nothing to show from his term in the Senate. He clearly talks the talk and has a posse of fiercely loyal supporters, but hasn’t done anything. The Democratic Party of Utah, as far as I can tell, only put him in office to be the token gay senator. Finally, given that health care is an important issue in Utah, a physician in the chamber would be a good addition to the system.

Anyway, if you’re interested in a moderate, thinking Republican who doesn’t tow the party line, I encourage you to visit his web site and see for yourself.

Ralph Becker (D) for State Legislative District 24

There isn’t a lot to say here: nobody is running against him, and that isn’t a problem. He has done a good job for the district.

Races that shouldn’t be partisan, and require no explanation

· Sim Gill (D), District Attorney

· Jim Winder (D), County Sherri f

__________ on Proposition 3

Salt Lake County is a mess: constantly gridlocked and crowded. A small raise in the sales tax could go to fund extensions in light-rail and the installation of a commuter rail system between Sandy and Ogden. However, I have to ask myself, “If we build these, will people give up their SUVs to drive to work in favor of the train?”

You decide.

  1. 3 Responses to “The Only Political Endorsements you Need to Read this Election.”

  2. I would love to see the extension of light rail. I believe there are enough people who would commute. I want to get the Ogden/Draper thing (mostly the latter) done so they can start on a line out to the airport. I would give up my car in a heartbeat if the city were more commuter/pedestrian-friendly.

    By Sasha on Oct 28, 2006

  3. Utah - lightrail? Hah!

    The lightrail here is fundamentally crippled in this regard - the layout of the entire Utah Metropolitan Axis is anything but pedestrian friendly. It is urban sprawl as far as the eye can see: strip malls, subdivisions with garages larger than houses (which lack a front porch), vast expanses of poorly zoned real estate, and city councils whose major source of incoming is building permits (Herriman, I’m look at you!).

    Public transit only works if you have pedestrian friend layouts - ala, NYC, Boston, Philly, DC, Atlanta, etc…

    The problem in Utah has nothing to do with SUVs, and everything to do with the people. As someone who did not grow up in Utah, I will try to summarize this as best I can. Utah has no local flavor. Utah only has chain stores, and large cookie cutter retailers (no I am not talking about WalMart). If it doesn’t have a brand name, Utah doesn’t want it.

    The brand envy is Utah is the fundamental problem here. Until the populace of Utah is willing to develop local flavor, rezone their business districts, abandon wasteful real estate practices, and start talking to their neighbors, build genuine commerce centers (instead of strip malls) and incorporate walkable neighborhoods, lightrail will remain nothing more than a pipe dream.

    The SUV is nothing to do with it - although, if we outlawed country music, and shot anyone with a cowboy hat, and limited households to no more than 3 children, we would see a dramatic decrease in the number of F-550’s being used as commuter cars. And I am all for that - because anything larger than a half-ton truck, should be used for commercial purposes only.

    By J. on Oct 28, 2006

  4. Mass transit works best in pedestrian friendly cities but not only in them. I would not call Tokyo pedestrian friendly, but the trains and subways are made for commuters and are the most efficient and wonderful transit I’ve ever experienced.

    It’s interesting to read the plans for attempted rejuvenation (ZCMI/Crossroads mall, renovating Trolley Square, changing Sugarhouse, downtown housing, etc.). But yes, those places will fill up with chain stores, and zoning is still a problem.

    By Sasha on Oct 29, 2006

Post a Comment